Evolution of Indian Constitution : A Historical Background

The History of British Rule in India: An Analysis of Its Evolution and Legacy

The British East India Company first arrived in India in 1608 as traders and established their trading monopoly under a royal charter granted by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600. Over the next two centuries, the British transformed from traders to rulers, culminating in India’s independence in 1947.

Independence necessitated a constitution. In order to do this, a Constituent Assembly was established in 1946, and the Constitution was ratified on January 26, 1950. Nonetheless, British rule is the source of many aspects of the Indian Constitution and political system. The legal foundation for the structure and operation of British India’s government and administration was established by a number of events under British rule. Our politics and constitution have been significantly impacted by these occurrences. Here, they are discussed historically under two main headings:
(A) The Company Rule (1773–1858) and
(B) The Crown Rule (1858–1947).
It also highlights the significant legislative acts introduced during these periods that influenced India’s constitutional framework.

The transition of the East India Company from a trading enterprise to a political power marked the beginning of British administrative influence in India. Several landmark acts during this period laid the foundation for governance and legal structures in India.

This was the first significant step by the British government to control the East India Company’s affairs in India and establish central administration.

This act had significant constitutional significance because :
(a) It established the framework for central administration in India;
(b) It acknowledged the East India Company’s political and administrative functions for the first time; and
(c) It was the first action taken by the British Government to control and regulate the Company’s operations in India.

This Act’s key features were as follows:—

1. Governor-General of Bengal:— The Act designated the Governor of Bengal as the “Governor-General of Bengal” and created an Executive Council of four members to assist him. Lord Warren Hastings was the first Governor-General.
2. Subordination of Presidencies:— The Governors of Bombay and Madras were made subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal, centralizing power.
3. Supreme Court Establishment:— A Supreme Court was established in Calcutta in 1774, consisting of one Chief Justice and three other judges.
4. Prohibition of Private Trade:— Company employees were prohibited from engaging in private trade or accepting bribes.
5. Increased Accountability:— By compelling the Court of Directors, the company’s governing body, to report on its income, civil, and military activities in India, it increased the British Government’s authority over the business.

Significance:

This Act marked the beginning of British parliamentary control over the East India Company and introduced centralized administration in India.

This Act addressed the shortcomings of the Regulating Act of 1773 and redefined the relationship between the Supreme Court and the Governor-General.

The following were the key features of this Act:

1. Exemption from Jurisdiction:— The Governor-General and his council, as well as Company servants, were exempted from the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction for official actions.
2. Exclusion of Revenue Matters:— Revenue-related issues were removed from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
3. Personal Law:— The Act mandated that Hindus and Muslims be tried according to their respective personal laws.
4. Appeals to Governor-General-in-Council:— Appeals from provincial courts were directed to the Governor-General-in-Council, bypassing the Supreme Court.
5. Regulatory Power:— The Governor-General-in-Council was empowered to frame regulations for provincial courts.

Significance of Amending Act of 1781:

The Act clarified legal ambiguities and ensured a more harmonious relationship between the judiciary and the executive.

This Act further tightened British government control over the East India Company and established a dual system of governance.

Key Features of Pitt’s India Act of 1784 were :

1. Separation of Functions:— The Act distinguished between the commercial and political functions of the Company.
2. Board of Control:— A new body, the Board of Control, was created to manage political affairs, while the Court of Directors continued to handle commercial matters. As a result, it established a double government system.
3. Supreme Control:— The British government assumed supreme control over the Company’s administration in India. Therefore, the act was important for two reasons: (i) For the first time, the Company’s territories in India were referred to as “British possessions”, and (ii) the British Government was granted ultimate authority over the Company’s operations and management in India.

Significance of Pitt’s India Act of 1784:

The Act formalized the dual governance system and consolidated British authority in India.

This Act was passed to accommodate the demands of Lord Cornwallis upon his appointment as Governor-General of Bengal.

Key Features of Act of 1786 were:

1. Override Authority:— The Governor-General was granted the power to override the decisions of his council in special cases.
2. Commander-in-Chief Role:— Lord Cornwallis was appointed as the Commander-in-Chief of the British Indian Army.

Significance of Act of 1786 :

The Act established a precedent for granting overriding powers to the Governor-General, enhancing centralized authority.

The Charter Acts were a series of legislative enactments passed by the British Parliament to regulate the East India Company’s affairs in India. These acts not only renewed the Company’s charter periodically but also introduced significant changes in governance, administration, trade, and education in India.
● Charter Act of 1793:— Strengthened the Governor-General’s power and increased the salaries of Company officials.
● Charter Act of 1813:— Ended the Company’s trade monopoly except for trade in tea and opium.
● Charter Act of 1833:— Centralized legislative powers and ended the Company’s trade monopoly entirely.
● Charter Act of 1853:— Introduced an open competition for civil services and separated legislative and executive functions.

This Act was introduced to renew the East India Company’s charter for another 20 years. It consolidated the Company’s authority while introducing administrative reforms that strengthened the Governor-General’s position and increased British governmental control.

Key Features of Charter Act of 1793:

1. Extension of Overriding Powers:— The overriding powers granted to Lord Cornwallis over his council were extended to all future Governor-Generals and Governors of the Presidencies. This provision ensured that the Governor-General had final authority in decision-making, particularly in cases of dispute.
2. Centralized Authority:— The Governor-General was given greater powers over the governments of the subordinate Presidencies of Bombay and Madras. This move aimed to strengthen the centralized administration and reduce inefficiencies caused by conflicting authorities.
3. Trade Monopoly Renewal:— The Company’s monopoly over trade in India was extended for another 20 years. This monopoly allowed the Company to dominate Indian commerce, particularly in commodities like spices, textiles, and opium.
4. Exclusion of Commander-in-Chief:— It was stipulated that the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces would not automatically be a member of the Governor-General’s Council unless explicitly appointed. This provision aimed to prevent conflicts between military and civilian governance.
5. Funding from Indian Revenues:— The Act allowed the salaries of members of the Board of Control and their staff to be paid from Indian revenues. This reinforced British sovereignty over Indian finances.

Significance of Charter Act of 1793:—

● The Charter Act of 1793 marked a further step toward consolidating British authority in India.
● It reinforced the centralization of power in the hands of the Governor-General and diminished the autonomy of subordinate Presidencies.
● The continued trade monopoly ensured the Company’s financial dominance but limited the economic opportunities of Indian merchants.

This Act renewed the East India Company’s charter for another 20 years but introduced significant reforms, particularly in trade and education. It marked the beginning of the British government’s direct involvement in the socio-economic development of India.

Key Features of Charter Act of 1813:

1. Abolition of Trade Monopoly:— The Act ended the Company’s trade monopoly in India, allowing all British merchants to trade freely in India. However, the monopoly on tea trade and trade with China was retained. This partial liberalization opened Indian markets to British traders but maintained the Company’s control over lucrative trade routes.
2. Assertion of Sovereignty:— The Act explicitly recognized the sovereignty of the British Crown over the East India Company’s territories in India. This declaration reinforced the British government’s ultimate authority.
3. Entry of Christian Missionaries:— Christian missionaries were allowed to enter India to promote education and religious conversion. This move had a profound impact on Indian society, introducing Western education and missionary schools.
4. Promotion of Western Education:— The Act emphasized the spread of Western education in British territories. It allocated funds for educational initiatives, which laid the groundwork for future reforms in Indian education.
5. Taxation Powers:— Local governments in India were authorized to impose taxes and punish those who defaulted on payments. This increased the financial autonomy of local administrations but also imposed a heavier burden on Indian taxpayers.

Significance of Charter Act of 1813:

● The abolition of the Company’s trade monopoly was a turning point in India’s economic history, integrating its economy more closely with the British Empire.
● The introduction of Western education played a crucial role in shaping modern Indian society by creating an educated middle class that would later play a pivotal role in India’s freedom struggle.
● The allowance for missionaries to operate in India introduced new cultural and religious dynamics, often leading to conflicts but also fostering social reforms.

Comparison Between the Charter Acts of 1793 and 1813

Feature	Charter Act of 1793	Charter Act of 1813
Trade Monopoly	Extended the Company’s trade monopoly for 20 years.	Abolished the trade monopoly except for tea and trade with China.
Governance and Control	Centralized power under the Governor-General.	Recognized Crown sovereignty over the Company’s territories.
Education	No specific provisions for education.	Promoted Western education and allocated funds for it.
Religious Missionaries	No provision for missionaries.	Allowed Christian missionaries to operate in India.
Taxation	Focused on centralized financial control.	Authorized local governments to levy taxes.

Legacy of the Charter Acts

The Charter Acts, particularly those of 1793 and 1813, were instrumental in shaping the socio-economic and political landscape of British India. While the 1793 Act consolidated British administrative control, the 1813 Act marked the beginning of significant social and economic changes. These acts laid the groundwork for subsequent reforms, including the eventual transition to Crown rule in 1858.

Their influence extends to modern India, as they introduced key administrative principles and governance structures that continue to shape the Indian state. The focus on education and infrastructure development during this period also created a foundation for India’s modernization. However, these acts also entrenched economic exploitation and social divisions, which remain part of the complex legacy of British colonial rule.

The Charter Act of 1833 marked a significant step toward the centralization of administrative and legislative powers in British India. It was introduced to renew the East India Company’s charter and redefine its role.

Key Features of Charter Act of 1833:

1. Governor-General of India:—
   ● The Governor-General of Bengal was re-designated as the Governor-General of India, with full civil and military authority over British territories in India.
   ● This act centralized authority under one individual, with Lord William Bentinck becoming the first Governor-General of India.
2. Centralized Legislative Powers:—
   ● The act deprived the Governors of Bombay and Madras of their legislative powers, consolidating all legislative authority with the Governor-General of India.
   ● Laws made under this act were called Acts, whereas those under previous regulations were termed Regulations.
3. End of Commercial Activities:—
   ● The East India Company ceased to function as a commercial enterprise and became solely an administrative body.
   ● The act stated that the Company’s territories were held “in trust for His Majesty, His heirs, and successors.”
4. Civil Service Reform:— The act proposed open competition for recruitment to civil services, asserting that Indians should not be excluded from holding government positions. However, this provision faced stiff opposition from the Court of Directors and was not implemented.
5. Codification of Laws:— It mandated the Law Commission, chaired by Lord Macaulay, to codify and standardize laws across British India. This led to the eventual drafting of the Indian Penal Code.

Significance of the Charter Act of 1833:

● Centralization of Authority:—	Marked the beginning of a unified administrative system for India.
● Abolition of Commercial Functions:—	Transitioned the East India Company into a purely governing entity, increasing the focus on governance.
● Legal Framework:—	Initiated the codification of laws, contributing to a more structured and uniform legal system.
● Civil Service Reform Attempt:—	Highlighted the potential inclusion of Indians in administrative roles, although not realized at the time.

The Charter Act of 1853 was the last in the series of Charter Acts and marked a turning point in the governance of India. It introduced significant reforms in legislative and administrative processes.

Key Features of Charter Act of 1853:—

1. Separation of Legislative and Executive Powers:—
   ● For the first time, the Governor-General’s Council was split into executive and legislative wings.
   ● The legislative wing, known as the Indian (Central) Legislative Council, functioned like a mini-parliament, with procedures similar to those of the British Parliament.
2. Open Competition for Civil Services:—
   ● The act introduced a system of open competition for the recruitment of civil servants, making it merit-based.
   ● Indians were also allowed to compete, leading to the formation of the Macaulay Committee in 1854, which standardized civil service recruitment.
3. Extension of the Company’s Rule:— The act allowed the East India Company to continue governing Indian territories on behalf of the British Crown but without specifying a fixed tenure. This implied the Parliament could terminate the Company’s rule at any time.
4. Local Representation:—
   ● For the first time, local (provincial) governments were given representation in the Central Legislative Council.
   ● Four of the six new legislative members were nominated by the provincial governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal, and Agra.

Significance of the Charter Act of 1853:—

● Legislative Reforms:— Established a more structured legislative system, with the Indian Legislative Council acting as a separate body.
● Introduction of Local Representation:— Gave provinces a voice in central legislation, a precursor to later federal structures.
● Civil Service Meritocracy:— Opened civil services to competition, promoting merit-based recruitment and eventually paving the way for Indian participation.
● Unspecified Tenure of the Company:— Highlighted the declining role of the East India Company, signaling an impending shift toward Crown rule.

Comparison Between the Charter Acts of 1833 and 1853

Feature	Charter Act of 1833	Charter Act of 1853
Governor-General’s Role	Created the Governor-General of India.	Separated the Governor-General’s legislative and executive roles.
Legislative Reforms	Centralized legislative powers under the Governor-General.	Established a separate Legislative Council.
Civil Service	Proposed open competition (not implemented).	Introduced open competition for recruitment.
Representation	No provision for local representation.	Introduced local representation in the Legislative Council.
Company’s Role	Ended the Company’s commercial activities.	Allowed the Company to continue ruling without a fixed tenure.

Legacy of the Charter Acts of 1833 and 1853

The Charter Acts of 1833 and 1853 left a profound impact on the governance of India:

1. Centralized Governance:— The 1833 Act created a unified administrative structure, which became the backbone of British India’s governance.
2. Legislative Framework:— The 1853 Act institutionalized legislative functions and local representation, setting the stage for later democratic reforms.
3. Civil Services:— The merit-based recruitment system laid the foundation for a professional civil service in India, eventually giving Indians a chance to participate in governance.
4. Transition to Crown Rule:— The acts highlighted the diminishing role of the East India Company, culminating in the Government of India Act, 1858, which transferred all powers to the British Crown.

While these acts strengthened British control over India, they also sowed the seeds for political and administrative modernization, contributing to India’s eventual quest for self-governance.

---

_